Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:27:35PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote:
> Roman Joost (Montag, 20. April 2009, 13:20):
> > I actually thought the the doap file would be now *the* compulsory
> > file for managing maintainers. Thats why I added more than me to the
> > doap file as a maintainer.
> >
> > Appearently that is not the case.
>
> "DOAP is primarily intended for computer consumption..."
My assumption was based on this mail:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gnome-infrastructure@xxxxxxxxx/msg00894.html
Now, because that's already a year old, things must have been changed
already ...
> > If you really need to, update the MAINTAINERS file.
> > I reckon it'll go away in the future...
>
> Why? It's a useful information at a prominent place, while
> nobody will read 'gimp-help-2.doap'.
I just saw both files read by the gnome infrastructure, not really by
people.
Cheers,
--
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanofski@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
