Hi, sorry for not replying earlier. Just had a teeth surgery and need a bit of time to relax. On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:53:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:33 -0500, Mark Beihoffer wrote: > > Thanks for the response - unfortunately, this did not work for me. > > > > I've tried to locate the HTML files, but all the files in the package > > I downloaded are XML files, not HTML files. > > I am sorry, it looks like the content of the help package changed and I > did not notice this change. Actually I'm puzzled. Because the last release also haven't had any pre-built HTML files and on a first thought I'm very sorry of this. But on a second thought and a check at the Makefile I think we never released the manual as pre-built HTML files, but always as a source release. The reason for doing is because the distributors always created their own packages, seperated by languages. > This is pretty bad. We used to ship pre-built HTML files in the release > tarballs. The installation instructions in the file INSTALL also still > refer to this situation. That's why I'm kind of confused. The past releases (prior to 2.4.1) are made one year ago and I can't say for sure how we did it. The built system changed to often ... > So they are pretty much wrong now. Roman, is > this an intentional change? Shouldn't at least INSTALL be adjusted then? I'll investigate this further soon as I'm feeling confortable. As for the situation of Mark currently have: either we fix the built-system and do another release of the 2.4.2 tag or we fix the built-system to support OpenBSD (probably faster). Greetings, -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanofski@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
