I have not been clear enough. In the present Changelog, we have for example: * src/filters... * images/filters... Svn status command displays M src/filters... A images/filters... The svn status display is more informative than the present changelog. I think we should use the svn status model in our Changelog for the reasons I put forward. Julien >> With gimp-2.4, there will be many changes, adds and deletions in Help. >> Could we use the svn status display (M src/..., A src/..., D >> images/...) in Changelog instead of the "* src/..." >> This would be more informative and commit more simple since the editor >> displays the svn status info. >> > > It is however very uncommon and, afaik, not supported by any editor out > there. Why don't you use your editor's ChangeLog editing capabilities? > In emacs for example, I use M-x add-changelog-entry. > > > Sven > > > > > _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
