Re: Returning to python-gegl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 12 February 2015 at 16:30, Joao S. O. Bueno <gwidion@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Otherwise, I think I will rewire the python bindings using another
> method to bridge to the C library, which is more predictive and better
> supported.

I've made a Python binding for my largish C library using
gobject-introspection and not had any serious problems. It was a bit
wonky a year or so ago, but it honestly seems OK now. Performance is
good too, and I don't see any memory leaks. I'm very grateful for it.

I've been trying to make a Ruby binding in the same way and oh dear oh
dear it's a lot harder :(

gegl-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership:

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux