Re: Fast paths and bug 592106

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree with comment 6 about snapping. Maybe it makes sense to have
separate operations that provide fast fip/mirror functions, since
those should always be pixel exact operations?

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Nicolas Robidoux
<nicolas.robidoux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I stand by Comments 6 and 7 of [1].
>
> Summary: The only way I can see fast paths working well without very very
> intricate programming (including round off error tracking etc) and without
> making the image "jump" in some situations is to make absolutely sure that
> the branching to the fast path occurs at a high enough level that any
> generic tool that can perform something which is "almost but not quite" the
> operation that the fast path performs never follows the fast path.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592106
>
> _______________________________________________
> gegl-developer-list mailing list
> List address:    gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
gegl-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list





[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux