On 29 November 2013 13:09, Daniel Sabo <danielsabo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > GEGL and Babl are both fairly stable right now, and much more stable > than the last official versions that Gimp 2.8 is getting built against > were. If there are no objections I am planning to make release of both > of these some time next week so we can move future Gimp 2.8 releases > to GEGL 0.3. Hi Daniel, new releases of GEGL+Babl would be nice. However, distributions will likely not be happy with a bumped major versions of libraries for a patch change of GIMP (2.8.x) Do we really use GEGL in GIMP 2.8? I thought mitch disabled all the GEGL powered functionality in 2.8 series. > The Babl release will be 0.2.0 because we have made some > non-backwards-compatible changes to color definitions that cause GEGL > 0.2's make check to fail. -- Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com _______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list List address: gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
