On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Victor Oliveira wrote: >> And so, some tests: >> >> 1. OpenCL version of motion-blur: 1.0 s (GeForce GT 430, year 2012) >> 2. CPU version of motion-blur: >10 s (Pentium 4 3.0GHz, year 2003) >> 3. GIMP's old version motion blur: ~2 s (faster, much faster gegl's) >> >> 10x times faster. But my CPU significantly slower and older than GPU. >> >> In this case I hope GIMP will keep his fast (even if 8bit-per-color) >> filters, sometimes speed is the main thing in image processing. Or >> may be GEGL will have faster operations for 8-bit data? > > But that's the point of using the GPU! We can have good and awesome > floating-point precision and speed :) Since your reply landed to my inbox before the original mail, how was CPU version measured? Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
