On 09/09/2010 04:51 PM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > Yep it is nice to get someone to document some of this process :), I > wonder if you can be tricked into documenting how to interpret the > statistics in /tmp/babl-stats... He, we'll see. If the trickery involves fried chicken... > Comments for the editnotes, it would have been easier to reply to > these, in context if you asked them as questions here on the > mailinglist rather than embed them in the document. Yes, the idea was not to either quote the whole thing or take the questions out of context, but that leaves the answers ... out of context. ;/ (but I did add little numbers for reference) Maybe I should do it the other way around, and put some sort of tag/number in the document, so it's easy to find the spot the question is about. Thank you for all the answers. > packed/interleaved/chunky I'll just pretend I didn't read that, until I see how to do that without just bluntly tricking babl. ;) Regards Rupert _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
