Re: final versions of samplers gegl-sampler-upsize.c and gegl-sampler.upsharp.c (upsmooth still needs work)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 22:11 -0400, Nicolas Robidoux wrote:

> Of course I am preaching for my church, but I don't really see why one
> would want to use bicubic or lanczos (or even bilinear) instead of
> this new trio upsize, upsharp and upsmooth.
> 
> ------
> 
> Next on the to do list: first, resamplers tuned for downsampling,
> then, "universal" samplers, which use Jacobian information to
> automatically pick a method appropriate for the situation.

Wow, we should really change the GIMP code to use the GEGL operations
for scaling or at least allow the user to pick the GEGL ops so that we
can drop the legacy scaling code in GIMP as soon as the performance
issues are resolved.

Are there any performance issues at all? I guess we'd have to try what I
suggested above to find out...


Sven


_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux