Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 05:09:50PM +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>   
>> The only thing I can see missing now is taking care of invoking gnulib-tool
>> --update properly in autogen.sh and provide a helpful message why this 
>> fails, if it fails.
>>
>> Is there any de facto standard way of doing this?
>>     
> In my (biased) humble opinion, GNU M4 integrates the gnulib tree
> into it's git repository in a neat and easy to manage way.
>   

The M4 way [1] indeed looks very nice and maintainable, could you 
provide a patch for that approach please?

- Martin

[1] 
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=m4.git;a=commitdiff;h=33434cee444ebefb51734ec286857e7639500ad3
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux