On 12/4/06, Nathan Summers <rockwalrus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/4/06, Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > for instance would
> >
> > gegl_node_blit_bufffer
> >
> > be better than
> >
> > gegl_node_blit_buf,
>
> What's wrong with gegl_node_blit?
Not much, except that it perhaps should be called gegl_node_render
or something more people would understand easily.
/Øyvind K.
2006-12-05 Øyvind Kolås <pippin@xxxxxxxx>
%s/gegl_node_blit_buf/gegl_node_blit/
* gegl/gegl-node.c (gegl_node_blit):
* gegl/gegl-node.h:
* gegl/gegl.h:
* bin/gegl-projection.c (task_render):
--
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
-- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
