On 10/17/06, geert.jordaens@xxxxxxxxxx <geert.jordaens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>If you scale a image to 10% of the original size using cubic, you have
>a situation where the data for each destination pixel is taken from a
>region of 4x4pixel, whilst it should at least be taken from a region
>of 10x10pixels, 84% of the image data is thrown away.
OK, the handling of scaling down is not yet in the proposition
Could we not just add the scale factor to the API ?
The scale factor is not enough, if we scale it to 10% horizontally and
70% vertically (or add some kind of rotation as well). A fixed scale
factor would no longer be correct. Doing a reverse transform of the
"corners" of the destination pixel would give us all the information
we need, and work for perspective transforms as well, hence the method
I suggested.
/Øyvind K.
--
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
-- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/
_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
