* Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxxxx> [060310 13:53]: > Oh, 6 years old. Got it. > > 6 years... I wonder if changing to a higher level language like C++ or > better yet C# (mono has good enough support now) would speed up the > development. I think it would. > > What do you guys think? The reason for using C is that it is much easier (possible) to make bindings for other languages, C, C#, C++, Python, Ruby etc. The biggest obstacle to GEGL development as I see it, is that in its current state it doesn't do any actual image processing. Personally I find it difficult to improve on a non-working system. I am aiming to improve on this by next weekend when I am going to do a presentation about GEGL at LGM [1] in a bout a week. My current efforts of replacing all the image processing of horizon [2] gives reason for optimism [3], the code that is in CVS is doing what it is intended to do and my overview of what needs to be done is improving. /Øyvind K. [1] http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/ [2] http://pippin.gimp.org/horizon/ [3] http://pippin.gimp.org/tmp/gegl/ -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/ _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
