Re: Gcc 94 / 10.2 has no GCC 20 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 27 Oct 2024, 01:03 Segher Boessenkool, <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 08:19:36AM +0200, Florian Weimer via Gcc-help
> wrote:
> > * Phil Phil via Gcc-help:
> >
> > > whatever. 11 should be safe?
> >
> > C++20 support is still experimental in GCC 11 (or any GCC release so
> > far).  Unless you are experimenting, you should not use it.
>
> The very last things in the library were implemented in GCC 14?  But no
> doubt some bugs remain, of course.
>
> Other than the library GCC 12 was feature-complete already?  And GCC 11
> was *almost* there (most C++20 things were implemented during GCC 8 and
> GCC 9 development).
>
> Well, there are still some module things wanting, but that is true for
> *any* compiler, so no project depends on that either!
>
> There has not been ten years of experience with GCC C++20, so yeah it
> is still experimental in that sense, but so is C++20 per se!
>

It's experimental in the sense that the library ABI is unstable.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux