Re: Sanitizer CHECK failed: sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:133

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm using GCC version 13.2

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 13:12, Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Deepthi H via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am facing the issue on enabling sanitizers for gcc on aarch64 linux.
> > The issue was observed with the following command :-
> > "aarch64-poky-linux-gcc -O1 -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer -o
> > test test.c"
> >
> > *AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:131
> > "((kSpaceBeg)) == ((address_range.Init(TotalSpaceSize,
> > PrimaryAllocatorName, kSpaceBeg)))" (0x600000000000, 0xfffffffffffffff4)
> > (tid=389)    <empty stack>*
> >
> > I found a patch that fixes the sanitizer issue for arm64  on llvm :-
> > ⚙D60243 [LSan][AArch64] Speed-up leak and address sanitizers on AArch64
> for
> > 48-bit VMA (llvm.org) <
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D60243#change-1yIlOwF0zl2Y>
>
> That should've been synced into GCC ages ago. What version of GCC are
> you using?
>
> >
> > I analyzed and tried to port the patch that fixes the issue for llvm.
> After
> > backporting the LLVM patches to the GCC sources, I encountered several
> > build errors, particularly related to the AddressSanitizer (ASan) and
> > LeakSanitizer (LSan) libraries. I have fixed lsan and asan issues.
> However
> > sanitizer_common is completely different in gcc than llvm.
> > Can you please help me fix this issue on gcc sources or is than any other
> > way to fix this issue.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Deepthi
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux