Do the options -pedantic and -pedantic-errors mean anything to -std=iso9899:2011

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





I think the subject line says it all.

Looking at :

 https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Standards.html#C-Language

I see :

  The original ANSI C standard (X3.159-1989) was ratified in 1989 and
  published in 1990. This standard was ratified as an ISO standard
  (ISO/IEC 9899:1990) later in 1990. There were no technical differences
  between these publications, although the sections of the ANSI standard
  were renumbered and became clauses in the ISO standard. The ANSI
  standard, but not the ISO standard, also came with a Rationale
  document. This standard, in both its forms, is commonly known as C89,
  or occasionally as C90, from the dates of ratification. To select this
  standard in GCC, use one of the options -ansi, -std=c90 or
  -std=iso9899:1990; to obtain all the diagnostics required by the
  standard, you should also specify -pedantic (or -pedantic-errors if
  you want them to be errors rather than warnings). See Options
  Controlling C Dialect.

  Errors in the 1990 ISO C standard were corrected in two Technical
  Corrigenda published in 1994 and 1996. GCC does not support the
  uncorrected version.

  An amendment to the 1990 standard was published in 1995. This
  amendment added digraphs and __STDC_VERSION__ to the language, but
  otherwise concerned the library. This amendment is commonly known
  as AMD1; the amended standard is sometimes known as C94 or C95. To
  select this standard in GCC, use the option -std=iso9899:199409 (with,
  as for other standard versions, -pedantic to receive all required
  diagnostics).

  A new edition of the ISO C standard was published in 1999 as
  ISO/IEC 9899:1999, and is commonly known as C99. (While in
  development, drafts of this standard version were referred to as C9X.)
  GCC has substantially complete support for this standard version; see
  https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html for details. To select this
  standard, use -std=c99 or -std=iso9899:1999.

  Errors in the 1999 ISO C standard were corrected in three Technical
  Corrigenda published in 2001, 2004 and 2007. GCC does not support the
  uncorrected version.

  A fourth version of the C standard, known as C11, was published
  in 2011 as ISO/IEC 9899:2011. (While in development, drafts of this
  standard version were referred to as C1X.) GCC has substantially
  complete support for this standard, enabled with -std=c11 or
  -std=iso9899:2011. A version with corrections integrated was prepared
  in 2017 and published in 2018 as ISO/IEC 9899:2018; it is known as C17
  and is supported with -std=c17 or -std=iso9899:2017; the corrections
  are also applied with -std=c11, and the only difference between the
  options is the value of __STDC_VERSION__.

Looking also at :

  https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html

There I see :

  -std=

     Determine the language standard. See Language Standards Supported
     by GCC, for details of these standard versions. This option is
     currently only supported when compiling C or C++.

With some adjustments or tuning flags such as "-Wpedantic" for some nice
warnings about GNU extensions.

HOWEVER I DO NOT see the flags "-pedantic" nor "-pedantic-errors" there.
I see some goodness documented at :

  https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html

However that page talks about ANSI C but no mention of something like
the C11 std or others.


So the question here is :

    Do the options -pedantic and -pedantic-errors mean anything to
    the -std=iso9899:2011 C Language spec?



--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux