On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 03:01:58PM -0400, Sid Maxwell wrote: > Of course, I should've thought of that. Thank you, Arsen! [ Please don't top-post. ] > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:01 PM Arsen Arsenović <arsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sid Maxwell via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Thank you, Segher. > > > > > > One thing that might be helpful would be, as I read the current "GNU > > > Compiler Collection Internals > > > For gcc version 14.0.0 (pre-release)", to compare it with the version of > > > the same document that was relevant for 4.3.0. Do you know where I might > > > learn which version is appropriate, and where I might find it? ( > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ only seems to have the current version.) > > > > You should have received a copy in the info format in your gcc 4.3.0 > > source tarball or distribution. Not in the info format, those are binary files (.info files). Instead, the source code (in the doc/ directory) has the documentation in TeXinfo format (.texi files). https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ has all versions going back to 2.95.3, just look a bit further down? :-) But yeah, just git log -p gcc/doc/ will tell you most. Maybe not in the best presentation for what you need -- but usually it is best to have multiple representations and use what most suitable in any particular situation :-) Segher
