On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:02 AM Jędrzej Dudkiewicz < jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 9:34 AM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2023-06-30 at 09:29 +0200, Jędrzej Dudkiewicz wrote: >> > > > Currently I am compiling using the following compiler/linker >> options: >> > > > -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -flto >> -Wl,--exclude-libs,ALL >> > > > -Wl,-r,--discard-all -Wl,-flto >> > > >> > > Hmm, isn't "-r" for partial linking? How can you use it to link an >> > > executable? >> > >> > Well, final binary works so I suppose it simply makes no difference. >> > Reason for it being here is simple: I've been trying basically all >> > combinations of options that according to The Experts Of The Internet >> > should somehow make my binary smaller. Since this is combination that >> > ended with smallest binary. >> >> I've no idea why it even works in your case. When I try them for a >> Hello World program, the produced "a.out" file is an ELF relocatable and >> I cannot run it at all. >> > > You are right, thank you. I checked it twice and this option simply wasn't > passed to the linker. I removed both -r and -Ur from linker options and it > builds again - final binary is slightly slower, but main problem (symbols > from boost::asio) still persist - if this is a problem at all, of course. > Not slower, smaller. Sorry for the confusion. -- Jędrzej Dudkiewicz I really hate this damn machine, I wish that they would sell it. It never does just what I want, but only what I tell it.
