Incorrect replacement of TYPE_METHODS with TYPE_FIELDS causing segfault.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



While compiling gcj on my mstermerge branch (
https://github.com/Zopolis4/gcj/tree/mstermerge) it breaks on, amongst
other things, an internal compiler error:
echo ../../../../gcj/libjava/classpath/lib/java/lang/ref/*.class >
java/lang/ref.list
echo ../../../../gcj/libjava/classpath/lib/java/lang/reflect/*.class >
java/lang/reflect.list
In file included from <built-in>:31:
../../../../gcj/libjava/java/lang/Object.java: internal compiler error:
tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in layout_class_method,
at java/class.cc:2627
In file included from <built-in>:63:
java/lang/Object.java: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
function_decl, have field_decl in layout_class_method, at java/class.cc:2627

I believe that this error is due to the following incorrect code at line
2589 at gcc/java/class.cc:
  for (tree method_decl = TYPE_FIELDS (this_class);

Before it was removed, this line was:
  for (method_decl = TYPE_METHODS (this_class);

But I have since modified it (
https://github.com/Zopolis4/gcj/commit/1f38bc896a704290ca0b742c60c60a88d5e1fb07#diff-bf49cdc948b20b9f25afd3fbb36922a10e979a55ff9600b3b51d0ec54175b752L2592)
in accordance with 5aaa8fb40681ee66282d73dab8c8eccbf5ee0518

Given that this was incorrect, what would be the correct way to replace
this instance of TYPE_METHODS? Were all my replacements of TYPE_METHODS in
gcc/java/class.cc wrong?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux