On Sat, 2022-03-05 at 01:03 +0530, Krishna Narayanan via Gcc-help wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working on this issue(PR92209) and had a query concerning it,for
> this PR I have done by making the required change in text rather than
> a fix-it diagnostic. Either of the two should be fine right?
TL;DR gcc-help is not an ideal place to discuss this. You can send your
patch to gcc-patches to get a review, or leave a comment in the bugzilla
for discussion.
If you only change the text, it will be:
t.c:1:1: warning: a function prototype must specify the argument types [-Wstrict-prototypes]
1 | static int f();
| ^~~~~~
To me it is even worse than what we have now:
t.c:1:1: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
1 | static int f();
| ^~~~~~
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
