I am having a C programing problem where <= is interpreted as < when using GCC 11.2.0 I was debugging a larger program which I broke down into smaller sections of code and I noticed the following code was not working correctly: #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> #include <float.h> int main(void) { float n, step; step = 0.1; for (n = 2; n <= 10; n = n + step ) printf("%3.4f\n", n ); /* This stops at 9.9000 and not at 10.0000 */ } I tried the above code only using the following include statement #include <stdio.h> but the result was the same. And I also wrote the following code to try and do the same thing in a different way and the output was the same as the above code: #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> #include <float.h> int main(void) { float n, step; n = 2.0; step = 0.1; do { printf("%3.4f\n", n); /* This stops at 9.9000 and not at 10.0000 */ n = n + step; } while (n <= 10); } I am new to programing and the following details may help you: I followed the instructions at this site: https://winlibs.com/ WinLibs standalone build of GCC and MinGW-w64 for Windows and I downloaded the following: Release versions UCRT runtime GCC 11.2.0 + LLVM/Clang/LLD/LLDB 13.0.0 + MinGW-w64 9.0.0 - UCRT - release 2 (LATEST) Win32: 7-Zip archive* | Zip archive - without LLVM/Clang/LLD/LLDB: 7-Zip archive* | Zip archive Win64: 7-Zip archive* | Zip archive - without LLVM/Clang/LLD/LLDB: 7-Zip archive* | Zip archive I clicked on the Zip archive highlighted in yellow which does not include LLVM/Clang/LLD/LLDB I then went to this site https://github.com/brechtsanders/winlibs_mingw/releases/download/11.2.0-13.0.0-9.0.0-ucrt-r2/winlibs-x86_64-posix-seh-gcc-11.2.0-mingw-w64ucrt-9.0.0-r2.zip and downloaded winlibs-x86_64-posix-seh-gcc-11.2.0-mingw-w64ucrt-9.0.0-r2.zip The Operating System I am using is Windows 7. I have been to your site https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/ and searched your Archives back to July viewing by Thread and by Subject and the search term I used was the less than or equal to symbol <= but if the answer was there I am sorry but I missed it. I have also searched the GCC Manual for version gcc-11.2.0 but if the answer was there I am sorry but I missed it. Thank you for any assistance you can give me. Bob