Re: Question about -O1 level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Thanks. With -fsanitize I got some more hints to find the problem.




Regards,
Mahmood






On Friday, July 30, 2021, 8:56:28 PM GMT+2, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 







On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, 15:37 Marc Glisse, <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Mahmood Naderan via Gcc-help wrote:
> 
>> I have noticed that my program with -O1 receives segmentation fault 
>> while if I manually specify all 45 O1 switches described in [1], the 
>> programs runs without problem. The gcc version is 9.3.0. I wonder if -O1 
>> do something more than those switches.
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_-O1_.28-O2.2C-O3.2C_-Os_or_-Og.29_equivalent_to_individual_-foptimization_options.3F


That's why what you tried doesn't work. Instead of trying to disable all the optimization passes, have you tried building your program with -fsanitize=undefined instead?


> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux