On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:22:58PM -0400, Danielle Church wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:54 AM Segher Boessenkool > <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Is there no way to get the code-emit behavior (inline the > > > function or emit a TU-external reference, don't emit standalone > > > definition) without the optimizer changes (more likely to inline the > > > function, even if it's a bad idea)? > > > > extern attribute((gnu_inline)) > > Does ``extern inline attribute((gnu_inline))'' behave appreciably > differently than C99's bare ``inline''? They seem to have the same > effect from the documentation, though with reversed semantics for the > presence vs absence of the extern keyword. Neither GNU inline nor standard C inline is inclusive of the other. A gnu_inline extern inline is never emitted as a standalone function. Segher
