Re: ARM cross-compiler with newlib, LTO, undefined reference to libc symbols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 >> This is a continuation of trying to build some software for the Nintendo 3DS,
>> which is an ARM platform. After applying the patches in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100767, I no longer get an ICE,
>> but now I'm getting a lot of undefined references to libc symbols, like free
>> and snprintf and malloc. Thing is, if I build this application without LTO, it
>> builds fine, so there appears to be something strange going on in the LTO
>> process that makes it so ld can't figure out how to link libc with everything
>> else.
>>
>> Some things I've tried and done:
>>
>> - I've confirmed that the libc being linked has those symbols by checking the
>>   output of nm against that libc.a.
>>
>> - I spent a few hours trying to step through ld to figure out how it
>>   determines when a symbol is undefined, but I didn't make much headway. I did
>>   find a place (_bfd_generic_link_add_one_symbol) where it appears to be
>>   setting some data structures to undefined, but I can't figure out how it's
>>   making that decision (it's some sort of table???).
>>
>> - I replaced the libc.a (and honestly all of lib/ for the cross-compiler, I
>>   made a backup to restore it after the test) with the one from devKitARM
>>   (from the devKitPro group, they provide GCC toolchains for a bunch of
>>   Nintendo platforms), and I was still getting undefined references, so it
>>   doesn't seem to be a problem of how I'm building my own newlib library (or both
>>   of these libraries are built wrong).
>>
>> - I tried to reproduce the problem with a simpler example, but I wasn't able
>>   to (I probably just don't know what I'm doing).
>>
>> I'm more than willing to help collect information to track down the source of
>> the problem, but I'm going to need some pointers in the right direction. The
>> application in question has a somewhat convoluted build process (what is it
>> with embedded development communities and super fancy Makefiles?) and it also
>> requires specific patches against newlib (adds a new system library), so it's a
>> little hard for me to have someone else try to build this and reproduce it (the
>> "official" 3DS GCC toolchain suffers from the LTO ICE bug, so I can't check if
>> their libc behaves properly, and their toolchain is even more annoying to
>> build).
>>
>> In summary, any tips on what I should be looking for to track down the cause?
>> Let me know if you need more information from me also.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gabe Marcano
>>
>
> I was able to reproduce the problem with a small example:
>
> main.c:
>   #include <string.h>
>
>   int f();
>
>   int main() {
>           return f();
>   }
>
>   void _exit(int v)
>   {
>           for(;;);
>   }
>
> t1.c:
>   #include <stdlib.h>
>
>   int f() { return (int)malloc(0x0);}
>
>
> With commands:
> arm-none-eabi-gcc -O -flto -g -c -o main.o main.c
> arm-none-eabi-gcc -O0 -flto -g -c -o t1.o t1.c
> arm-none-eabi-gcc -O -flto -g main.o t1.o -o main
>
> I was able to reproduce this with my non-3ds arm cross compiler that doesn't
> have the https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100767 patch, so it seems
> unrelated to that issue. I had to pass -O0 to the t1.c compilation so it
> wouldn't just optimize the malloc out.
>
> Let me know if you need any more information, or if you think this is a
> binutils bug and I should go and report an issue there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabe Marcano

To be clear, the error I'm seeing with the example is this:

 /usr/libexec/gcc/arm-3ds-none-eabi/ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 0000000000008018
 /usr/libexec/gcc/arm-3ds-none-eabi/ld: /tmp/ccPp7lyA.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `f':
 /home/gabriel/tmp/t1.c:3: undefined reference to `malloc'
 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Without LTO, I just realized it doesn't build, but it's because I'm missing the
_sbrk newlib syscall definition, which is expected. Just adding the following
function to main.c lets the non-lto build complete:

  void *_sbrk(int incr) {
          return NULL;
  }

Gabe Marcano




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux