Re: libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a even if static is disabled?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christer Solskogen via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a even if static is disabled?
From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:13:52 +0200
Cc: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <rhjqfa$p8d$1@ciao.gmane.io> (Christer Solskogen via Gcc-help's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:19:22 +0200")
References: <rhjqfa$p8d$1@ciao.gmane.io>
Reply-to: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)

* Christer Solskogen via Gcc-help:

> How is it that libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a are compiled/installed when
> configuring gcc with --disable-static --enabled-shared?

libgcc.a only exists as statically linked code.  Not sure about
libgcc_eh.a; the dynamic libgcc_s does not depend on it as far as I can
see.

Thanks,
Florian

References:
- libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a even if static is disabled?
  - From: Christer Solskogen via Gcc-help

Prev by Date: AW: C and C++ parser performing optimizations
Next by Date: aarch64 inline asm / -fPIC problem
Previous by thread: libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a even if static is disabled?
Next by thread: GNU fortran compiler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux