On 7/10/20 5:05 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
On 10/07/2020 23:57, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 22:47, Jonny Grant wrote:
On 10/07/2020 09:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Right at the bottom of the page is the link to the doc you've been
using, which says "Please note that the following documentation refers
to current development. Some information may not be applicable to any
existing release."
The reality is, on big pages, people don't often get to the bottom of the page below 2.95.2. You're right, I missed that note down there.
Which is why the docs for the unreleased development sources are
tucked away right at the end.
Fair enough.
I recall it came up via a google search for one of the options. If it had "dev" or "beta" in the URL it would be clearer.
It's a common mistake. I agree that more prominently mentioning
the version would help. Including it in the file name seems like
a simple enough change.
The manual does mention the GCC version (the cover page of the PDF
copy of the manual says "For GCC version 11.0.0 (pre-release), and
the Introduction section of the HTML version says "corresponds to
the compilers (GCC) version 11.0.0." That's helpful but not as
much as if every page mentioned it at the top (for the HTML, it
would have to be in the browser title bar), and if the URL of
development version also included it.
Martin
