Re: g++ command line checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-07-10 08:37 +0100, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Thank you for you reply.
> 
> On 10/07/2020 00:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 23:54, Jonny Grant <jg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello
> > > 
> > > I noticed g++ ignores -W as I understand it that alone doesn't turn
> > > anything on?
> > 
> > No, -W is identical to -Wextra.
> 
> I looked but couldn't find any mention of it.
> 
> Is it worth documenting this on the page?
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html

It's already there:

> -Wextra
> This enables some extra warning flags that are not enabled by -Wall. (This
> option used to be called -W. The older name is still supported, but the newer
> name is more descriptive.)
 
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html
> > > 
> > > Also may I ask if specifying both -pedantic -Wpedantic be an error? They
> > > are the same as I understand. g++ doesn't reject them both being
> > > specified.
> > 
> > They mean the same thing. It's not an error to repeat options.
> 
> Fair enough, it doesn't help anyone remove duplicates from their warning list
> in makefile etc though.

In many real packages the building system just works fine with a lot of
duplicates.  Even the building system of GCC itself compiles many files with
duplicated options.  If you really hate duplicates it's simple to find them:

echo $CFLAGS | sed 's@ @\n@g' | grep -v "^$" | uniq -d

> > > Another example is -O1 -O0 -O3, the later -03 seems to be used. Maybe nice
> > > to say too many optimization options specified?
> > 
> > No, it's common (and very useful) to append an option to the end of a
> > command and have it override earlier options.
> > 
> > This behaviour is documented, and relied on by many people.
> 
> clang gives a nice helpful warning I recall.

No.  You can try:

$ clang -O1 -O0 -O3 test.c
(no diagnostics)

> I usually just amend the optimisation earlier in the command line myself.
> 
> 
> This isn't directly related, but the main page doesn't show what version of
> GCC it refers to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/
> 
> Could the page show what version it is on that page?

git master.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux