Re: Undefined behavior or compiler bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 18:34, Tibor Billes <tbilles@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using the -fsanitize=undefined flag and got a runtime error after a
> > compiler upgrade from 7.2 to 9.3. I was happy at first that the upgraded
> > compiler caught an error that I can fix before it hits me in production.
> >
> > However after some investigation, I cannot figure out what's wrong in the
> > code. That's why I seek help on this mailing list, can someone explain
> > the bug to me? Or is it a bug in the compiler that I should report?
> >
> > The simplified version of the test code on Compiler Explorer:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/7rAxJj
> >
> > It shows that different compiler versions behave differently.
> >
> > There is a comment on line 16 that explicitly defaults the Derived
> > constructor. If you switch the comment with line 17, both compiler verions
> > run fine without producing the runtime error although the defaulted
> > constructor should be exactly the same the user defined one:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/UShm-u
> >
> > Can someone please explain what's wrong?
>
> Looks like a bug, please do report it to bugzilla, thanks.
>

Ok, here it is: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693 .
Thanks for your quick response!

Tibor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux