On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 18:21, andre maute wrote: > > On 5/2/20 1:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 23:59, andre maute wrote: > >> > >> I wonder if this is expected behavior > > > > It's a known limitation that the analyzer doesn't support C++ yet. > > > > So nevertheless should these two be filed as bugs? No thank you. > The first being the iteration over the empty vector. The analyzer dev says "it's not worth trying -fanalyzer with C++ at this point. Hopefully GCC 11." > The second the one for the warning flag given by the output of -fanalyzer > but which doesn't trigger anything if used alone. That's expected, -Wanalyzer-null-dereference requires -fanalyzer to do anything. > Regards > Andre
