Re: Hot to test for _FORTIFY_SOURCE with Autoconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 00:16, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 8:11 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 22:15, Jeffrey Walton via Gcc-help
> > <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to test for availability of _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2.
> >
> > What does that mean?
>
> I'm trying to determine if the compiler supports FORTIFY_SOURCE.
>
> When _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is used, *_chk functions are used when the
> compiler can determine the destination buffer size. Effectively the
> compiler inserts those Microsoft safer functions that the libc folks
> rejected.

I don't think the compiler inserts anything. _FORTIFY_SOURCE enables
features in Glibc, not GCC.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux