On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 18:25, Marco Sulla <gnu.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, but I do not want to install it. I would use it to **recompile* > again gcc 9.2 and then install it. Then you need to install it somewhere. You can use --prefix=/tmp/gcc and remove that directory after you're finished with it if you want. But why do you want to do that? GCC already does a 3-stage bootstrap where the last stage (the one that gets installed) is built by itself. So building it *again* is redundant. > In theory the executable should exists, even if I have not installed > the build on the machine. No, your theory is wrong. > PS: what about the warnings for zlib and libffi? You don't need them for the default set of languages, see the other reply you got to your mail.
