Re: Stable Version to build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nevermind. I found the branches; I was expecting tags and was lost. ignore
this thread.

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:45 AM J Decker <d3ck0r@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> so... I found this.  https://gcc.gnu.org/git/ (or maybe rather  git://
> gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git  )
> which I have cloned, but when I build this version, there's a checksum
> difference in stage 2 and 3 libiberty (and a few other objects).
>
> What might be a good, recent, version to build from?
>
> I also had to make some minor changes to force 'HAVE_PSIGNAL' in libiberty
> config.in and opt-suggestions.c failed with selftest.c which generates an
> assert about option "-"  (commented out assert)
>
> And maybe it's either of those changes causes the issue because there is
> some option in the scripts that is deliberately bad and should generate a
> suggestion? (I doubt it).
>
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux