On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 5:33 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 21:25, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:26 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ... > > > I already sent the following to Jeffrey 8 hours ago (off-list, because > > > I could only send HTML mail at the time): > > > > > > "Those are the docs for GCC trunk. That function is not listed in the > > > docs for GCC 7." > > > > GCC tells me it supports the load by accepting -mcpu=power9 and > > defining _ARCH_PWR9. > > > > The problems with GCC seem to be a little larger then inaccurate docs. > > What? You're talking nonsense. > > You said: > "According to the GCC docs vec_xl_be is available with ISA 3.0: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/PowerPC-AltiVec-Built-in-Functions-Available-on-ISA-3_002e0.html > " > > You are consulting the docs for GCC trunk and assuming they apply to > GCC 7. That's simply wrong. The docs don't list an "applies to" or "since". We asked for that about 5 years ago. Here is the link returned for a search of "GCC vec_xl_be". There is no mention of GCC 10.0 or limitations on availability: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/PowerPC-AltiVec-Built-in-Functions-Available-on-ISA-3_002e0.html Like I said, you don't understand how search works and how users use it. Jeff