Is it safe to assume that ggc_cleared_alloc() return memory that has been zeroed ?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Is it safe to assume that ggc_cleared_alloc() return memory that has been zeroed ?
From
: William Tambe <tambewilliam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:07:59 -0500
Is it safe to assume that ggc_cleared_alloc() return memory that has been zeroed ?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Is it safe to assume that ggc_cleared_alloc() return memory that has been zeroed ?
From:
Jeff Law
Prev by Date:
Re: Propagating addresses from linker to the runtie
Next by Date:
Re: Is it safe to assume that ggc_cleared_alloc() return memory that has been zeroed ?
Previous by thread:
Linker doesn't replace weak functions in assembly with global function in C when LTO is turned on
Next by thread:
Re: Is it safe to assume that ggc_cleared_alloc() return memory that has been zeroed ?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux C Programming]
[Linux Kernel]
[eCos]
[Fedora Development]
[Fedora Announce]
[Autoconf]
[The DWARVES Debugging Tools]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux GCC]
