On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 07:23:01AM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Sun, 8 Sep 2019, Ayrat Gaskarov wrote: > > But it would be a real pain to add asm volatile for every possible > > variable and computations that were previously (and after) done (may > > be even from callers up a stacktrace). Could we somehow avoid this? > > You can move the code-that-shall-not-be-disturbed in a separate function > and limit visibility of interprocedural analysis into that function, > for example by compiling it in a separate file without LTO, > or calling it via a pointer received from an asm, e.g.: Or just declaring it with __attribute__((noipa)) :-) Segher