Re: argument "named" of TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



William Tambe <tambewilliam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Is it normal behavior that the argument "named" of TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG
> is false for the first argument of a variadic function, even-though it
> is named ?
>
> Documentation says about the argument "named" of TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG that it is:
> "true for an ordinary argument and false for nameless arguments that
> correspond to ‘…’ in the called function’s prototype"

Unfortunately, for historical reasons, you need to define
TARGET_STRICT_ARGUMENT_NAMING to hook_bool_CUMULATIVE_ARGS_true
to get a sensible value for "named".

Thanks,
Richard




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux