Hi, Is it correct to use __builtin_expect these 2 ways? #define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) 1) Negation before likely/unlikely. if (!unlikely(cond)) { ... } if (!likely(cond)) { ... } I've replaced all !unlikely to likely and vice versa in the Linux and obtained different binary results: ./scripts/bloat-o-meter ./vmlinux-old ./vmlinux-patched add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/4 up/down: 41/-35 (6) Function old new delta dpaa2_io_service_rearm 357 382 +25 intel_pmu_hw_config 1277 1285 +8 get_sigframe.isra.constprop 1657 1665 +8 csum_partial_copy_from_user 605 603 -2 wait_consider_task 3807 3797 -10 __acct_update_integrals 384 373 -11 pipe_to_sendpage 459 447 -12 Total: Before=312759461, After=312759467, chg +0.00% 2) As a part of the condition. if (unlikely(r == -ENOMEM) && domain != bo->allowed_domains) { ... } if (unlikely(info->thread_notes == 0) || unlikely(view->regsets[0].core_note_type != NT_PRSTATUS)) { ... } if (*s && unlikely(!d_can_lookup(root)) { ... } Thanks, Denis