On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 6:31 PM Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > We don't use <x86intrin.h> because it is missing on too many systems > > we support (even those that use GCC). > > > > Is there a way to get GCC to provide the functions through a system > > header as expected? > > #include <x86intrin.h> > > It *is* a system header. And it is provided by GCC, and it gives you > _mm_roti_epi64, provided you have GCC 4.5 or later. > > If you don't want to use it, you're on your own. Good luck. I believe <x86intrin.h> is a GCC specific header. I believe the expected header is <amminstrin.h>. Is there any reason GCC can't just follow conventions and stop making the shit up as they go? Jeff
