Jason Mancini said: > We've determined that the gcc perf drop is due to use of decltype(auto) as the > return type for template functions. Replacing with a known type or func(...) -> decltype(...) > trailing type syntax seems to avoid the performance issue. I misspoke here. Turns out that the above replacement made everything equally slow. So the performance bug was lurking in there, and gcc-7-branch r249333 exposed it more. Yeah yeah, we need to get an offending code blob cleaned up, approved, and bug filed. I've been using gcc9 snapshots with part of r249333 reverted in the mean time to make forward progress vetting gcc9 on our code base (no other problems so far!) Jason
