Re: gcc9 snapshot 20190414 is 30x slower than gcc 6.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-04-17 02:09 +0000, Jason Mancini wrote:
> > Using gcc 6.3, my C++ source file compiles in 1m2s with -O0.  With snapshot
> > 20190414 (compiled with --disable-checking
> > and -O2 and make install-strip), it takes 31 minutes to compile the same
> > file with -O0.  Have I overlooked disabling some
> > snapshot self-checking code?  Are there known configuration mistakes that
> > could result in this sort of performance
> > degradation?  Thanks!  It will take a while to go back and try other gcc 6,
> > 7, 8, and 9 snapshots to collect points of reference.
> > Both are pretty heavy on memory, gcc6 uses 3.7G and gcc9 uses 5.4G for this
> > file.  There's a lot of templatized headers.
> 
> Latest data points:
> gcc-6.3/6.4 take about 43 seconds
> gcc-7.2 takes 30 minutes
> gcc-8.2 takes 27 minutes
> gcc-9.0 takes 31 minutes (snapshot 20190414)
> clang 6.0.1/7.01 take about 31 seconds
> 
> This is frustrating, as I'm going to have to capitulate to using clang here
> for a very large user base.  We've been a gcc
> shop for decades.

We'll never know why unless you can give a testcase to reproduce this issue.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux