Re: regarding df_regs_ever_live_p

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:25:08PM -0500, William Tambe wrote:
> What is the reason that GCC does not always automatically include the
> frame-pointer and return-address registers in df_regs_ever_live_p such
> that it is necessary to check respectively frame_pointer_needed and
> crtl->profile ? ie:
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/gcc-8_3_0-release/gcc/config/fr30/fr30.c#L145

The code that actually sets up the frame pointer or return address is not
yet necessarily part of the rtl stream where these checks are used.  The
prologue code is inserted in the pro_and_epilogue pass, which runs a bit
_after_ reload (or LRA, in the more modern world).  So DF does not see
those insns yet, because they simply do not exist yet ;-)

The target can make sure the entry block defines these regs, but it sounds
like fr30 did not do that.


Segher



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux