* Stefan Ring: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:27 PM Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> * Stefan Ring: >> >> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:53 PM Florian-Bogdan Tudoran >> > <tfbogdan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> We're currently using C++14 at my workplace and we're contemplating a >> >> switch to C++17. We're using GCC 8.2.1 as that's what's provided by Red Hat >> >> 7. >> > >> > There is already a devtoolset-8, at least on CentOS. >> >> There is? I'm surprised that >> >> <https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-8/> >> >> results in an error then. I expected it to be parallel to >> >> <https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-7/> >> >> , following >> >> <https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/?search=devtoolset> >> >> . >> >> Do you know where the non-productized software collections live these >> days? > > Sources: http://vault.centos.org/7.6.1810/sclo/Source/rh/devtoolset-8/ > Binaries: http://centos.mirroraustria.at/7.6.1810/sclo/x86_64/rh/devtoolset-8/ > > And I got mine for CentOS 6 from here: > http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHSCL/SRPMS/ Ah, this is actually the usual place. devtoolset-7 is next to it, after all. Thanks. I will ask around why softwarecollections.org hasn't been updated.