Gábor Boskovits writes:
> It seems that the errors you were getting are related to 128 bit
> floating point support. It also seems that 128 bit floating point
> support is enabled on 64 bits. I'm not sure about the 32 bit case
> though, do you get the same error there?
Ah! That makes me even more supicious... I was wondering about this
command
i386-unknown-linux-gcc ... -DIN_GCC -o _muldi3.o -c ../.././libgcc/libgcc2.c
this i386-unknown-linux-gcc compiler is the bootstrap compiler,
gcc-4.1.0 (or we may be able to use 2.95.3); is that OK? Shouldn't the
new `xgcc' compiler be used to compile libgcc2?
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@xxxxxxx> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
