On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 11:35, U.Mutlu wrote: > > Jonathan Wakely wrote on 06/22/2018 11:42 AM: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 07:32, U.Mutlu wrote: > >> (The manual version has of course the disadvantage that user has to define an > >> additional variable and because of that, put the code in its own scope...) > > > > You don't have to change the scope: > > > > for (size_t i = 1, vec_sz = vec.size(); i < vec_sz; ++i) > > Yes, I know that, but it lacks the "const" attribute. Does it matter? The compiler can still see it doesn't change.
