On 04/05/18 10:46 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
On 2018-04-29 14:47 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I think we still need a human to look over the results and then
determine to what degree the results are reasonably clean or just
another nightmare of fails in gfortran and g++ and go etc etc.
AFAIK on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, I think we can only ignore some FAILs in
gcc.dg/guality. They use GDB and the result (debugger output) tends to
be wrong with optimization. Other tests should not FAIL.
My result was sent:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-05/msg00374.html
# of unexpected failures 72
That looks really good.
I don't have platforms other than x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (though I may buy
a mips64 in 2019).
I have builds going now on ppc64 and sparc64.
Dennis
