Re: GCC 7.3 g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails on Centos 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jan Boehme <jan.boehme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GCC 7.3 g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails on Centos 6
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:40:57 +0000
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <p6e2k5$5la$1@blaine.gmane.org>
References: <CAKFpmfPvwostbf44UR7pcRTBRvnvcMh8nyrmWs4xAMEgha94bA@mail.gmail.com> <p6e2k5$5la$1@blaine.gmane.org>

On 19 February 2018 at 08:43, Jan Boehme wrote:
> It seems to me that this regression? is unknown or accepted over there. Any
> encouragement to file a bug for Centos/Redhat?

Yes, please do.

References:
- GCC 7.3 g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails on Centos 6
  - From: Jan Boehme
- Re: GCC 7.3 g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails on Centos 6
  - From: Jan Boehme

Prev by Date: Re: Pack expansion in mem-initializer-list with expression-list
Next by Date: Re: I can't make Bugzilla account and there is possible GCC Ada (GNAT) bug in optimizing the code - ada.numerics.real_arrays Real_Matrix multiplication slower than doing things 'by hand'. I attached code.
Previous by thread: Re: GCC 7.3 g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails on Centos 6
Next by thread: suspicious error 'static declaration follows non-static declaration'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux