On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Peter T. Breuer <ptb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Also sprach Jonathan Wakely:" >> >> On 7 February 2018 at 16:34, Peter T. Breuer wrote: >> > I'll repeat the paragraph from my summary this morning. >> >> Please don't, your sophistry is still off-topic. Repeating it doesn't > > Kindly explain why explaining is off-topic in your opinion. > >> make it any less so. > > Sophistry \Soph"ist*ry\, n. [OE. sophistrie, OF. sophisterie.] > The art or process of reasoning; logic. [Obs.] [1913 Webster] > > Correct. I am exact, which is the minimum anyone can be. Good. Now since you claimed that you were a mathematical logician in one of the previous e-mails, I will let you know as a newcomer in this mailing list that the set of axioms in this mailing list that you keep posting to includes the proposition that said that "a discussion on the C language issue is disallowed", another proposition that said that "if a discussion is about a C language issue, then the discussion is off-topic", and another proposition that said that "an off-topic discussion shall not be discussed any longer." So, can't you stop now, please, you who claimed to be http://dblp.uni-trier.de/pers/hd/b/Breuer:Peter_T= ? -- Best regards, Tadeus
