Re: signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Peter Breuer <peter.t.breuer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 18:22:41 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180206150300.457d70e5@betty.enbd.org>
References: <20180206150300.457d70e5@betty.enbd.org>
User-agent: Alpine 2.20.13 (LNX 116 2015-12-14)

See the definition of "usual arithmetic conversions" in the text of the standard
and note that they are not applied to bitwise shift arguments (they undergo
integer promotions individually).

HTH.
Alexandr

References:
- signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule
  - From: Peter Breuer

Prev by Date: Re: signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule
Next by Date: Re: signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule
Previous by thread: Re: signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against
Next by thread: Re: signed/unsigned integer conversion for right shift seems against C99 rule
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux