RE: target_clones constexpr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthias Kretz [mailto:m.kretz@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 7:24 AM
> To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Schulz, Roland <roland.schulz@xxxxxxxxx>; Victor Rodriguez
> <vm.rod25@xxxxxxxxx>; Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>; O Mahony, Billy
> <billy.o.mahony@xxxxxxxxx>; Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: target_clones constexpr
> 
> On Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 20:37:55 CET Schulz, Roland wrote:
> > I would like to do something like: [...]
> 
> +1
> 
> > I would like to use width to do manual strip-mining or instantiate
> > SIMD C++ templates. The problem is that this doesn't compile because
> > __builtin_cpu_supports isn't constexpr. For every clone of foo, the
> > compiler knows the SIMD support at compile time. I'm looking for a
> > builtin which lets me query that in a constexpr way.
> 
> AFAIK there is nothing (I'd be happy to be proven wrong). I also can't think of
> any hack that would produce the value as a constant expression. (I tried
> `using v64 [[gnu::vector_size(64)]] = float; alignof(v64)`, but its alignment is
> 64, independent of the register size it uses.)

I filed it as feature request: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83875

Roland




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux