On 11/20/2017 11:36 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > On 20/11/17 18:54, Jeff Law wrote: >> Hopefully for gcc-9 I can extend that work to include a level of >> simulator testing for the embedded targets. I certainly won't be >> tracking regressions or anything like that, but instead just looking to >> see if the generated code is generally runnable or not. > > in case RTEMS counts as an "embedded target" from your point of view, > then please let me know if you need some help to set it up. It runs on > several simulators (GDB, Qemu). It supports C++11 threads, Ada, Fortran, > libgomp, libatomic. Go would be also feasible, but we have to add > ucontext support for this. It does. In fact RTEMS was something I wanted to set up within the builder but didn't have the time (yet). So you may well get a ping from me on this at some point. It's interesting primarily because it goes beyond just compiling libgcc and newlib -- which gives deeper testing of the code generator for the appropriate targets and opens the possibility of doing simulator testing. Jeff
